Indicator Definition
| Indicator Name | The project has a functional Feedback and Complaints Response Mechanism (FCRM) in place |
|---|---|
| Indicator Definition | A functional Feedback and Complaints Response Mechanism (FCRM) ensures that all stakeholders, especially primary stakeholders and other community members, have access to a safe, accessible, and effective system for submitting complaints or feedback related to project activities, staff behavior and other concerns/incidents. It is crucial that the mechanism guarantees that individuals can voice their concerns without fear of retaliation, including the risk of being excluded from the project, denied services, or facing any other form of negative consequence.
A functional FCRM includes the following elements:
This indicator helps ensure that projects meet accountability standards by providing stakeholders with a mechanism to raise concerns or issues and identify areas where FCRMs may need strengthening or adjustment. It will also help to demonstrate transparency and commitment to accountability to donors and stakeholders. |
| Related to Old Performance Indicator | General indicator 002 |
Disaggregation
Presence (yes/no) of a functional FCRM in each project, country office, or implementing partner.
Data Collection
| Data Source and Means of Verification | Different FCRM elements require verification through various sources: Awareness and Accessibility: Assessed using surveys or interviews with primary stakeholders and staff to ensure stakeholders are aware of and can access the FCRM. Note, for humanitarian projects, questions about awareness are included in the ECHO Protection Mainstreaming KOI monitoring tool, which are to be reported under HUM 003. It is sufficient to ask the two survey questions (ACC1 and ACC2) as formulated by ECHO to assess the primary stakeholder awareness and accessibility. Timely Response, Confidentiality, Safety, and Resolution Process: Verified through interviews/questionnaires with complainants (where feasible) and staff involved in handling complaints. |
|---|---|
| Measuring Frecuency | Continually: The FCRM system should maintain robust FCRM records to log new complaints, response times, types of responses, and outcomes. |
| Data Collection Guidance | CRM Records: Track each complaint, type of complaint (sensitive vs. non sensitive), and resolution status in the system/spreadsheet, with regular updates to monitor functionality.
Interviews and Surveys: Conduct periodic interviews with complainants, stakeholders, and staff involved in handling complaints to verify FCRM awareness, accessibility, timeliness, and confidentiality, as well as satisfaction regarding the resolution process and outcomes. |
How to report
Each project will report either Yes or No.
The project can only report “Yes” is all the criteria of the definition is met and verified. If the project itself does not have FCRM in place, but the main implementer (Helvetas or Partner) has a functional FCRM in place, then the project may answer “Yes” in the case where the criteria outlined in the indicator definition holds and are verified.