Indicator Definition
| Indicator Name | CDR 1.3.3 Number of people covered by new measures based on a disaster/climate risk assessment that increase resilience and/or improve biodiversity |
|---|---|
| Indicator Definition | This indicator counts people living in areas covered by implemented measures based on a disaster or climate risk assessment that improve resilience and/or biodiversity. These could for instance be people who:
As this is an output indicator, it focuses on the immediate results of implemented measures rather than whether the people actually benefit from them. |
| Related to Old Performance Indicator | FAN 311 and CDR 412 |
| Indicator Level | Output |
Disaggregation
| Disaggregation |
|
|---|---|
| Measuring Unit | The number of people living in areas covered by new measures, based on a disaster or climate risk assessment, that aim to improve resilience and/or biodiversity. Measures must have been specifically designed following an assessment to be counted under this indicator. |
Examples of Actvities
While many types of measures could potentially contribute to increased resilience and/or improve biodiversity, only measures that are based on disaster or climate risk assessment should be counted towards this indicator.
Climate Change Adaptation:
Construction of flood defences
Implementation of drought-resistant agriculture
Water resource management
Reforestation projects
Sustainable land management practices
Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR):
Installation of early warning systems
Construction of cyclone shelters
Creation of evacuation plans
Training communities in emergency response
Ecosystem and Biodiversity Improvement:
Restoration of wetlands
Afforestation and reforestation projects
Establishment of protected areas
Promotion of biodiversity-friendly agricultural practices
Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM):
Implementation of coordinated management of water, land, and related resources to balance social, economic, and environmental objectives.
Establishment of water user associations and basin-level committees.
Rehabilitation and maintenance of water infrastructure.
Measures do not include awareness rising or training activities.
Data Collection
| Data Source and Means of Verification | Project Documents: List of measures implemented (condition: based on disaster or climate risk assessment). Government Records: Any official documentation or agreements related to the implemented measures. Community Verification: Testimonies or records from community leaders or community members on the implementation of the measures. Public or other reliable records on the number of people living in areas where measures have been implemented. |
|---|---|
| Measuring Frecuency | Data should be collected continuously throughout the project or whenever a significant milestone is reached. |
| Data Collection Guidance |
|
| Common Challenges | Challenge: Accurately estimating the number of people affected by large-scale measures like watershed management. Approach: Do your best to make reasonable estimates and avoid overreporting. Ensure estimates are based on transparent and well-documented assumptions. Always record the methodology used for calculating the number of people reached. |
How to report
Annual Reporting: At the end of each year, aggregate the number of people covered by the measures implemented within the reporting year. Ensure that data is broken down by the relevant disaggregation categories.
This number will in most cases be an estimate, it is important not to overreport but to have a pragmatic approach to the estimation.
Narrative Reporting: Include a narrative explaining the context of the numbers, highlighting any trends, challenges, or changes during the project.
Related Indicators
| Related Donor Indicators | SDC:
|
|---|---|
| Related HELVETAS Indicators |
|