VIC 3.1 People benefit from better services

Indicator Definition

Indicator Name VIC 3.1 Number of people who benefit from social, economic, and/or protection services resulting from good governance processes
Indicator Definition

This indicator tracks the number of individuals, including migrants and forcibly displaced persons, who benefit from social, economic, or protection services. Only services resulting from good governance processes—defined as inclusive, transparent, accountable, and participatory—are counted. Activities must focus on advocating for and supporting local governments, civil society, and private actors to provide services through these governance processes, rather than directly providing the services. For example, if a water service is built without inclusive community involvement, it is not counted. However, if community dialogue and transparency have been part of the entire process, the stakeholders who directly benefit from these services are counted under this indicator. Hence, all projects (in all working areas) focusing on service delivery through inclusive, transparent, accountable, and participatory governance processes, should use this indicator. 

People: It is important to note that, in VIC projects, "people" refers to all individuals within the target area, with particular emphasis on women, underserved, vulnerable, and marginalized groups, as well as those in the Leave No One Behind (LNOB) categories.  This includes migrants, refugees, IDPs, etc. ensuring that those who are often excluded or face barriers to participation are prioritized in governance initiatives.

Social Services: Activities and programs that improve the well-being of individuals and communities, such as education, healthcare, water, sanitation, hygiene (WASH), and gender equality initiatives.

Economic Services: Activities and programs that enhance economic opportunities and livelihoods, such as vocational training, financial inclusion, agricultural support, and economic empowerment initiatives.

Protection Services: Activities and programs that ensure the safety and rights of individuals, such as legal aid, protection of women, ethnic groups, protection for migrants and displaced persons, child protection programs, and conflict resolution and peacebuilding initiatives.

Related to Old Performance Indicator

Indicator Level Outcome

Disaggregation

Disaggregation
  • Gender 

  • Age  

  • Left behind/vulnerable population group  

  • Migration status

Measuring Unit

Individuals, including migrants and forcibly displaced people, who benefit from social, economic, and/or protection services supported by Helvetas, estimated based on a representative sample of the target population.

Examples of Actvities

Advocacy and Legal Support:

  • Supporting local governments in creating legal frameworks that enhance inclusive access to social, economic, environmental and legal services. 

  • "Advocating (local) governments for the inclusion of citizens and legitimate interest groups, especially marginalised groups, in governance processes

Capacity Building:

  • Training civil society and private actors to effectively advocate for transparent and inclusive service delivery mechanisms.

  • Building local government capacity for participatory budgeting and community dialogue.

Policy Development and Implementation:

  • Supporting stakeholders in co-creating policies that ensure equitable resource distribution and access to basic services.

Stakeholder Engagement:

  • Facilitating participatory, inclusive planning processes with communities to identify needs and develop solutions for service delivery.

Monitoring and Accountability:

  • Establishing citizen-led monitoring systems to ensure accountability and transparency in service provision.

Support for Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs):

  • Facilitating collaboration between local governments, private actors, and civil society to co-design service delivery models.  This can also include academia, think tanks, media etc.

Data Collection

Data Source and Means of Verification

Survey with representative sample of the target population.

Note! If relevant, collect data for VIC 3.1, VIC 3.2, VIC 3.3, and VIC 3.4 in the same survey (if relevant).

While numbers based on the service provider can be useful for verification, they should not serve as the primary data source for this indicator. This is because service provider records may be incomplete or inaccurate. Additionally, relying solely on these records would miss important insights on user awareness, satisfaction, and potential gaps in service access among current and prospective clients/users.

Measuring Frecuency
  • Baseline,

  • Midterm (if project lasts 3 years or more),

  • Endline

Data Collection Guidance

Conduct surveys at baseline, midline (if the project lasts three or more years), and endline. Use representative samples of the target population to gather data on the benefits received from social, economic, and/or protection services.

Common Challenges

Challenge: No budget/capacity for doing surveys.

Approach: Result measurement should be part of every projects’ budget, so remember to include this early in the planning phase. Conducting the data collection planning and data management will make it much more cost efficient and more valuable than hiring consultants. Possible approaches to reduce the complexity and cost of data collection. Suggested to use digital platforms or mobile apps (preferably KOBO). Train local stakeholders or community volunteers to conduct surveys, ensuring cost-effective and culturally sensitive data gathering. Incorporate participatory methods, such as focus groups or community mapping, to complement quantitative surveys and enhance local ownership of the process. And leverage partnerships with other NGOs or academic institutions to co-develop survey methodologies and share resources.

Challenge: Difficulty in reaching and surveying marginalized or hard-to-reach populations, such as migrants and forcibly displaced persons, who may purposefully remain unregistered, not want to disclose, lack stable housing or access to communication channels.

Approach: Use mobile data collection teams, partnerships with local NGOs, or community leaders to reach these groups and gather accurate data.

Challenge: Difficulty in identifying individuals as migrants, in particular for internal migrants

Approach: Build trust through local leaders, consider broader migration definitions (e.g., seasonal), and offer anonymous participation options.

Challenge: Some people might not trust surveys, especially if they have low confidence in governance.

Approach: Build trust by explaining the purpose of the survey and how it will help improve their community.

How to report

At project level: To calculate the total number of people benefiting from the service(s):

  1. Calculate the Proportion of Participating Households (PHH): Divide the number of respondents (one from each household) who confirm that they are: (1) Aware of the service(s), (2) Have used the service(s) (or a family member has), (3) And have benefited positively from the service(s), by the total number of respondents (households) surveyed:

    Number of pratciapting HH/Total survey HH=PHH

  2. Multiply by the Target Population: Multiply this proportion (PHH) by the total number of people in the target population (derived from baseline). This provides an estimated number of individuals who have benefited from the service(s):

    PHH * Total number of people un target population=Primary Stakeholders

  3. Disaggregation by Categories: Use the number of primary stakeholders from above and disaggregate for all mandatory disaggregation categories (e.g., gender, age groups, etc.). This can be derived from the baseline or census data e.g. if you identified 1000 primary stakeholder benefiting from better services and you know in the area the ration women to men and 60% to 40% then 600 primary stakeholders are female and 400 male, this can then be further disaggregated after age and whether a person belong to a left behind group.

  4. Important Notes on Assumptions and Sampling: This calculation assumes that household size distribution and other characteristics of the surveyed households are representative of the target population. Ensure that sampling follows random sampling or stratified sampling strategies to maintain representativeness and reliability of the results.

  5. Report for Transparency: Always report the numerator (number of participating households), denominator (total surveyed households), and total target population. This ensures transparency and enables consistent aggregation of results across projects.

This guidance was prepared by HELVETAS ©
Propose Improvements