Indicator Definition
| Indicator Name | HUM 006 Number of people provided with resources that enable them to protect and start rebuilding livelihood assets |
|---|---|
| Indicator Definition | This indicator measures the number of individuals supported in the immediate aftermath of a crisis by replacing critical productive assets that were destroyed by the disaster. The goal is to support and strengthen their rapid economic recovery without undermining the local economy and/or reducing vulnerability to future crises. Resources that enable people to protect and rebuild their livelihood assets include seeds, livestock, tools, business grant etc. Any kind of transfer modality (in-kind, voucher, cash) and combination thereof to support, protect and enable the restoration/protection/access of/to livelihood assets. Note: HUM 001 and HUM 006 are mutually exclusive within a single report. If a project supports the same target group with activities to cover both basic needs and to replace assets, select the most appropriate of the two indicators based on the relative activity volume. |
| Related to Old Performance Indicator | HUMRes 712 |
| Indicator Level | Output |
Disaggregation
| Disaggregation |
|
|---|---|
| Measuring Unit | Individuals who have received support to protect and rebuild their livelihood assets |
Examples of Actvities
Distribution of agricultural tools, seeds, and other inputs to restore farming activities.
Provision of livestock or poultry to replace animals lost in a disaster.
Support for small business recovery through the provision of equipment or materials (e.g. apiculture)
Cash or voucher assistance specifically aimed at replacing or protecting productive assets.
Provision of materials for shelter reconstruction that serve as assets for livelihood activities (e.g., materials for market stalls, workshops).
Implementation of programs aimed at rebuilding or protecting community-level infrastructure that supports livelihoods (e.g., irrigation systems, fishing gear).
Data Collection
| Data Source and Means of Verification |
|
|---|---|
| Measuring Frecuency | Data should be collected continuously as assistance is implemented and reported annually. |
| Data Collection Guidance | Data should be collected continuously as assistance is implemented and reported annually. Regular Monitoring: Collect data through beneficiary registration forms, distribution lists, and project reports. Post-Distribution Monitoring (PDM): Conduct surveys or interviews with beneficiaries after they have received support to confirm the receipt and use of livelihood assets. Field Observations: Conduct site visits to observe the use of distributed assets and verify their positive effects on livelihood recovery. |
| Common Challenges | Challenge: Ensuring that distributed assets are actually used for their intended purpose and contribute to livelihood recovery. Approach: Use PDM surveys and field observations to verify the use of assets. Challenge: Avoid counting individuals who may have received multiple forms of support under different actvities. Approach: Have a good primary stakeholder database in place, best with unique houshold IDs |
How to report
Aggregate the total number of individuals who have received support to protect and rebuild their livelihood assets, disaggregated by the relevant categories.
Related Indicators
| Related Donor Indicators | ECHO KRI: Number of people provided with resources that enable them to protect and start rebuilding livelihood assets related EU core indicator: Number of target beneficiaries (resident/host communities and displaced persons) gainfully (self)employed |
|---|---|
| Related HELVETAS Indicators |