WSG 1.1.5 Schools and health care facilities with access to basic sanitation

Indicator Definition

Indicator Name WSG 1.1.5 Number of schools and health care facilities that have gained access to (at least) basic sanitation services
Indicator Definition

Measures the number of schools and health care facilities that have gained access to at least basic sanitation services[1], which include improved sanitation facilities designed to hygienically separate excreta from human contact.

Basic sanitation in schools: Schools with improved sanitation facilities which are single-sex and usable at the time of the survey or questionnaire are classified as having ‘basic’ service. The term ‘usable’ here refers to toilets or latrines that are accessible to students (doors are unlocked or a key is available at all times), functional (the toilet is not broken, the toilet hole is not blocked, and water is available for flush/pour-flush toilets), and private (there are closable doors that lock from the inside and no large gaps in the structure).

Basic sanitation in health care facilities: Improved sanitation facilities are usable with at least one toilet dedicated for staff, at least one sex-separated toilet with menstrual hygiene facilities, and at least one toilet accessible for people with limited mobility. The term usable here refers to toilets or latrines that are accessible to patients and staff (doors are unlocked or a key is available at all times), functional (the toilet is not broken, the toilet hole is not blocked, and water is available for flush/pour-flush toilets), and private (there are closable doors that lock from the inside and no large gaps in the structure).

Improved sanitation facilities are those designed to hygienically separate excreta from human contact, and include: flush/pour flush to piped sewer system, septic tanks or pit latrines; ventilated improved pit latrines, composting toilets or pit latrines with slabs.



[1] Some areas may be used the terminology “facilities” instead of “services,” however, these are not the same.  The JMP framework defines “facilities” and “services” as follows:

  • Facilities are the physical infrastructure, such as flush toilets, pit latrines with slabs, or composting toilets, designed to hygienically manage waste. These are considered improved facilities due to their safe design.

  • Services refer to the usability and quality of these facilities. For a facility to qualify as a basic sanitation service, it must be:

    • Improved and not shared with other households.

    • Accessible, functional, and hygienic at the time of use.

For example, a flush toilet connected to a septic tank is considered an improved facility, but it does not qualify as a basic sanitation service if it is shared by multiple households or if it is non-functional. This distinction ensures the indicator reflects not just the presence of infrastructure but also the level of service experienced by users.

Related to Old Performance Indicator

WSG 112

Indicator Level Output

Disaggregation

Disaggregation
  • School/Health Facility

Measuring Unit
  • Schools and health care facilities in the project area that have gained access to improved sanitation services by Helvetas or Helvetas supported (implementing) partners.

  • Institutions reached indirectly through for instance technical assistance to governments resulting in expanded access to sanitation service should NOT be reported under this indicator.

Examples of Actvities

  • Construction of new sanitation facilities in schools and health care centres.

  • Rehabilitation of existing sanitation infrastructure in institutions. Installation of handwashing stations with soap and water.

  • Construction of new sanitation facilities in schools and health care centres.

  • Rehabilitation of existing sanitation infrastructure in institutions. Installation of handwashing stations with soap and water.

Data Collection

Data Source and Means of Verification

Project data on implementation plan and achievements

Measuring Frecuency

Data should be collected continuously throughout the project or whenever activities are completed.

Data Collection Guidance

There should be continuous monitoring of activities and outputs. The following methods can be used to verify sanitation service quality and sustainability:

  • Institutional Records: Data from school and healthcare registers on sanitation facilities.

  • Field Visits: Regular visits to assess the functionality and usage of sanitation facilities.

  • Surveys and Interviews: Periodic collection of feedback from school and healthcare staff on sanitation facilities access and management.

How to report

Report the number of schools and health care facilities that have gained access to basic sanitation services, disaggregated by type of sanitation service and JMP ladder classification.

An institution is only registered once during the project lifetime.

Related Indicators

Related Donor Indicators

USAID:


HL.8.2-8 Number of basic sanitation facilities provided in health facilities and schools as a result of USG assistance

Related HELVETAS Indicators

Access Additional Guidance

This guidance was prepared by HELVETAS ©
Propose Improvements